Observations:
1. Most Beneficiaries:
o The scheme with the highest number of beneficiaries is Parinayam, with 520 beneficiaries. This suggests that it is a highly utilized program, possibly addressing a widely relevant social need.
2. Significant Beneficiaries:
o Vidya Jyothi has 177 beneficiaries, making it the second most subscribed scheme. This indicates that educational or skill development support may be a prominent need.
3. Moderate Beneficiaries:
o Mathrujyothi and Prathyasa have 80 and 64 beneficiaries, respectively. These figures show moderate engagement, suggesting these schemes cater to specific, but not universal, social support requirements.
4. Lower Beneficiaries:
o Several schemes, including Swasraya, Pariraksha, and Psycho Social Grant in Aid, have between 40 to 50 beneficiaries, showing more limited engagement.
5. Least Beneficiaries:
o Sahachari and Athijivanam have the fewest beneficiaries, with 12 and 13, respectively. These programs may be more niche or targeted towards very specific groups.
Conclusion:
The data suggests that certain schemes, particularly Parinayam and Vidya Jyothi, address broad social needs, attracting a larger number of beneficiaries. Other schemes like Mathrujyothi and Prathyasa also serve significant but somewhat smaller groups. In contrast, the low beneficiary counts for schemes like Sahachari and Athijivanam imply that these are either more specialized programs or less widely promoted. This distribution could help in prioritizing resource allocation and promoting awareness where engagement is low.